The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Rabbit users - which core should I choose ?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Rabbit users - which core should I choose ?
  • From: "Kevin Hawkins" <lists@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:16:11 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Hi Dave,

=20

I think I=E2=80=99m going for the same core as you but I just w=
anted to check that I can use 2100 cores too with what I buy =E2=80=93 if
s=
o I might even buy the 2100 dev kit and a 3000 core. I am sure
I=E2=80=99ll=
only need 128K though =E2=80=93 used to a PIC with 8K !

=20

Did you buy from the UK ? =E2=80=93 ie do they now have the V8.01 C dec
sys=
tem =E2=80=93 the lady I spoke to (Kim) was unsure. I guess we=E2=80=99ll
b=
oth find out if we need that uC/OS-II stuff !

=20

Kevin

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave McLaughlin [mailto:dave@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 10 June 2003 17:43
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Rabbit users - which core should I choose ?

=20

Hi Kevin,

Funny you should ask that, but I was chatting with Stuart Poulton about
thi=
s the other day and my RCM3000 dev kit just arrived today so I am off home
=
tonight to have a play with it.

I ordered the 3000 version even though it only comes with a 256/128K
device=
it will be ideal to get started. You can easily buy a 512K version later i=
f you need the space but for me, the 256K will be ample. I only paid
=C2=A3=
240 INC for it so it is good value.

The great thing about getting the latest kit is that you now get the full
s=
tandard version of Dynamic C V8 with it. This has all the libraries
(except=
the additional uC/OS-II stuff etc) unlike the older V7 kits which had a st=
ripped down eval version. Make sure the kit you buy is the latest ones
with=
the V8 software and not the older V7.

I'll be able to update you later once I have had a play with mine. Off to
o=
rder and LCD controller for it to do the graphics stuff.!!

Regards
Dave...
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Kevin Hawkins=20
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Rabbit users - which core should I choose ?


Would appreciate some guidance here. About to buy a Rabbit development
system but have a couple of questions for someone who already develops wi=
th
these. Mainly around recommendation of which unit to go for - I need
Ethernet btw
Once I buy the development system for one core module I assume I ca=
n
use it directly on all the other core modules (I never have to buy anythi=
ng
different, pinouts the same etc ?) and that code I write can just be
recompiled for different cores ?
So why would people choose say the 2200 cores over the 3000 cores e=
g
the 2200 vs the 3010 - the latter is more powerful and has more I/O at th=
e
same cost - currently I am veering towards a 3000 dev kit - is this a
sensible choice ? - it looks like the lowest cost unit in small quantitie=
s
to produce the best priced final product.
However the 2100 dev kit is the only one that includes the higher
capacity 512K/512K, all the rest bundle the smaller family members 256/12=
8
device as standard. - The  bigger device may be better for initial
development (code bloat). Can I buy this dev kit and use it with the 3000
cores too ? Or just buy any dev kit and a couple of cores as needed.
Lastly , will I find that I should have (need) the extra =C2=B5C/OS=
-II
Real-Time Kernel as well ? Application is the xAP gateway (embedded versi=
on)
- ie Ethernet udp plus 2 serial ports at mid speed.

Kevin

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.