The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] 2Mbit ADSL


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [OT] 2Mbit ADSL
  • From: "Ian Willoughby" <ian@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:40:57 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Actually scrub that it does still use 2 IP addresses, so will only ever
achieve 256K per transfer :-(

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Willoughby
Sent: Fri 06/06/2003 10:38
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] 2Mbit ADSL



The A&A solution looks a lot better as it bonds the lines at the ISP
end, meaning you really do get 512K instead of 2 chunks of 256K in the
router solution (The highest single upload speed would only ever be 256K as
it is comming from 2 different IP addresses).



R's

Ian





-----Original Message-----

From: K. C. Li [mailto:li@xxxxxxx]

Sent: Fri 06/06/2003 10:04

To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Cc:

Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] 2Mbit ADSL







On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Paul wrote:



> Not looked into the figures - but wonder what the alternatives would

> cost for a 512Kbps upload and 1Mbps down i.e. taking TWO ADSL lines +

> cost of this box compared to a service that gives these speeds?  Did

> that make sense ;)



You might also like to check out http://www.aa.nu/newscentre.html.
Bonding

of two or more 512k/1Mb/2Mb ADSL is possible with their Firebrick unit or

using a Linux server. Our 2Mb ADSL service is with Andrews and Arnold and

their customer support is fantastic when compared with BTOpenworld.



Regards,



Kwong Li

li@xxxxxxx

Laser Business Systems Ltd.

http://www.laser.com






Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.