RE: Re: lists@xxxxxxx - SOLVED

["Craig" <lists@xxxxxxx>]

I think this has been fixed now, it was a problem with the max number of
ho=
ps on my smtp server. The default on the exchange server is 15, I have
chan=
ged this to 25.

I suggest other members running their own exchange servers check your
setti=
ngs on the smtp server, and it may fix the other non-deliveries people are
=
getting. This was unique to yahoo groups, due to the additional number of
h=
ops in the internal yahoo network.

Special thanks to Alex & Jake for sending smtp headers to help debug.

Cheers!

Craig

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: 20 May 2003 17:18
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: lists@xxxxxxx
>=20
>=20
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Stuart Grimshaw <stuart@s...> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 16:45, David Millard wrote:
> > > Well I=A2m the our-house as you can see and I also use a
pop3
> account
> > > which my exchange server 2000 grabs and distributes round
the
> house if
> > > anyone knows a way to resolve the infinite loop thing then
I=A2ll
> address
> > > it I had know idea it was happening nor any idea how to fix
it
> >=20
> > hmmm, have we spotted a pattern here? Could it be the Exchange
> server
> > that is rejecting the email?
> >=20
>=20
> I suppose it's possible, it depends on when the rejection occurs,
in=20
> my case the exchange server pulls down e-mail every half hour, so
if=20
> it bounces immediately (particularly with a couple of messages say
5=20
> minutes apart) you can rule out exchange from the equation. A=20
> detailed look at the e-mail headers may give a clue too. The domain=20
> of the home server is greenmanor, so any mention of that in any=20
> messages would certainly indicate it had reach the house.
>=20