Re: Re: Hosting multiple internal web servers behind a single IP

["Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>]

Dan, does it matter?

Mark has offered a helpful document for some users. I say "bring it
on",
anything that's interesting or useful deserves to be  on the list.

Personally, I couldn't give a rats ass if another approach is better, lets
hear what Mark has to say!

Ian.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan" <dtoma@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Hosting multiple internal web servers behind a
single IP


> Hi Mark,
>
> Please let me comment your startements:
> > Actually, using different ports is a bad idea.
> >
> > A good number of UKHAers work for employers / clients where
internet
> > access is limited to port 80.
> Usually is limited to HTTP, but HTTP can be on another port too.
> So... even a Proxy/Firewall server is used then you can acces other
ports
> like:
> http://server.site.com:81 for
example.
>
> > As such, running everything over port 80 and virtual hosting
works,
> > in the real world, much better than using PAT.
> If host headers is used, then it can be an issue for home use.....
> You must register multiple domains and or servers at the same IP
address
in
> order to work.
>
> > Alas, not all of us have office locations which have FULL
internet
> > access :-(
> How is this statement related with PAT?
>
> BR,
> Dan