The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Fw: FTP passive ports for firewalls


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: OT: SETI



I wonder if the SETI search could divert CPU usage into helping the military
find Osama Bin Laden??? ;o)

Calm down everyone! Both are causes are worthwhile (well one definitely is)

Regards

Simon


----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Lowe <ian@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 January 2003 21:28
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: SETI


> >If you actually read the IP staatement in its entirety, there really is
> >nothing to worry about. (unless of course you are a barrack room lawyer)
>
> Read it again, this time minus the rose tint. Publication of information,
no
> matter how useful it would be to the ongoing research of other groups
> seeking a cure worldwide, will simply not happen if this threatens the
> ability of Oxford and UD to get some nice juicy patents.
>
> >I really don't think that the lack of an opensource client implies that
> >an organisation is sinister per-se
>
> No one is saying, or implying, that UD are "sinister". What they are is a
> purely commercial entity, who will act to protect the interest of it's
> shareholders first, with the public interest second. If you are happy with
> that, fine, use the software, but don't start throwing around cheap digs
> like "if anyone cares".
>
> I care, but I think that cancer research is better served by organisations
> who publish openly in the spirit of scientific progress, not those who
seek
> to tie everyone else's research up in patents and licences.
>
> >The fact that CPU cycles were diverted at a particularly sensitive time
if
> you
> >look at things from a common sense perspective should really not be an
> issue.
>
> Personally, I find deceiving people who thought they were finding a cure
for
> cancer into carrying out free research for the military morally repugnant,
> and not in the least "common sense".
>
> However, this is OT for UKHA, so this is my final comment on the subject.
>
> Ian.
>
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx >
> List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
HGTV Dream Home Giveaway

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.