The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fw: Theoretical LD11 Usage


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Fw: Theoretical LD11 Usage
  • From: Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:10:48 +0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

As with any LD11 tho, pressing the switch does not send an X10 - so by
it's very nature, you can get "out of sync"...

G.

Gareth Cook
SWG EMEA North Account Manager
IBM SWG - BTE Office - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx


----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 17/12/2003 12:07 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

Martin Greenwood <Martin_Greenwood@xxxxxxx>
Today 10:31

.
Subject:
.
Re: [ukha_d] Theoretical LD11 Usage
.
Category:



Gareth,

Also they could easily get out of sync. Especially if you have an RF
X10 or other X10 controller.
If one light was already on and you pressed the third switch then then
it would turn off and the other one would turn on. Probably not what
you want!!

I have separate switches for each LD11 and also some RF HR10 switches
around as they are easier to use to turn lights up or down than the
momentaries.

Martin


UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.