Re: [OT] Mail Cleaning (Was: Re: Legal disclaimers)

[Ross McKillop <home@xxxxxxx>]

Less cluttered if people quote them in multiple replies, less space
taken up on disk (I never delete eMail - it just moves around :P)
besides I don't like banners on websites, i don't like adverts (all for
services I'd never use and aren't available in the UK) in my eMail.

Also it would use less bandwidth the few times I do download mail when
I'm not at home (using a GSM link... those 5 extra lines in 50 messages
make a difference at 9.6k!)

--
Ross McKillop
On 8 Dec 2003, at 11:59, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:

> On Monday 08 December 2003 11:45, Ross McKillop wrote:
>> I've just realised that the method outlined in my previous post
could
>> also be used to remove...
>>
>>
>>  From all INCOMING messages before they hit my mailbox....
>>
>> /me goes to reconfigure mailserver :P
>
> Can I just ask what the point is? Surely once it's got to you the
> bandwidth
> has been wasted? If it's at the bottom of the message then it's out of
> the
> way, you don't have to scan past it to be able to read the rest of the
> message ...


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and is believed to be clean