Re: Digital prints from 35mm negatives

[Doogie Brodie <ukhad@xxxxxxx>]

Benfield, John wrote:

> It maybe no cost to them but it costs *me* and I was rather
disappointed.
> However I don't want to go and get a scanner if the results would be
equally
> poor. The other option is to upgrade for a fully digital SLR but
somehow I
> don't think 1) I can justify to myself and 2) I will never be able to
> justify it to SWMBO.

Fortunately it's my SWMBO who wants a digi slr :).... but me who needs
to save up for it :/

--
Doogie