[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: X10 - how ?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: X10 - how ?
- From: "Kevin Hawkins" <lists@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:53:51 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> From: Jon Boden
> Sent: 05 December 2003 15:14
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: X10 - how ?
>
> My own input on this.... Im using X10 for my home and as a
> family home solution for appliances, lights and heating it
> has proved to be cost effective and very stable for me -
> the point of X10 is to reduce the need for extra wireing
> and thats what its done for me ))
INDEED - very true John - and although I use C-Bus I also still use X10 in
some places for exactly this reason. Whilst I have had problems with X10 re
'dependability' I have spent the time to find out what was causing the
problem and I now have an almost guaranteed X10 system in place, over a
fairly large area. C-Bus is not a simple retrofit solution although the RF
versions will be - at a price ...
> I think its a shame that
> X10 has not evolved more over the years, I still think X10
> product solutions are limited but I suspect as I enhance
> my home automation other products will be used along side
> my current setup -
Yep - the real shame was that the two way/status issue was not adopted more
pervasively.
K
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|