The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: X10 replacement ?


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: X10 replacement ?
  • From: "patricklidstone" <patrick@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:07:25 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> I just hope the finished product is as good as your FIRM units
Frank.
> The protocol is my own based around the SNAP protocol.  I do like
Both
> xPL and xAP and still watch both camps. At the time I decided on my
> route, xAP was to heavy a protocol table.lamp.lounge etc was far to
many
> bytes for what I needed. It needed Speed and the increase in speed
in
> the electronics would then be reduced by the overhead of the extra
bytes
> required for direct xAP etc.

Have you looked at the xAP spec since UID's were introduced? These
partly address (ho ho) the concerns you've raised (but not
completely).

Patrick



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.