[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: X10 replacement ?
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: X10 replacement ?
- From: "patricklidstone" <patrick@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:07:25 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> I just hope the finished product is as good as your FIRM units
Frank.
> The protocol is my own based around the SNAP protocol. I do like
Both
> xPL and xAP and still watch both camps. At the time I decided on my
> route, xAP was to heavy a protocol table.lamp.lounge etc was far to
many
> bytes for what I needed. It needed Speed and the increase in speed
in
> the electronics would then be reduced by the overhead of the extra
bytes
> required for direct xAP etc.
Have you looked at the xAP spec since UID's were introduced? These
partly address (ho ho) the concerns you've raised (but not
completely).
Patrick
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|