RE: Neo vs Pronto

["Rob Mouser" <rmouser@xxxxxxx>]

The Marantz RC3200 is worth considering, MUCH prettier than the Neo,
learning capability is poor. I reviewed it for Marks site here:

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=3D1128&slashSess=3D215=
f
92c740747598a09c43b620d574bb

IMPORTANTLY, since I reviewed: the latest software release allows
copying and pasting of ProntoEdit 4.0 IR codes into the Marantz
software. So downloaded ccfs etc can be raped for their code strings. Or
off course you could learn them for him and email him the string or ccf
etc.

Many thanks
=20
Rob Mouser
rmouser@xxxxxxx
rob@xxxxxxx
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Smith [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 April 2003 13:29
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Neo vs Pronto
>=20
> A colleague is considering a pronto style remote for the first time.
>=20
> I have a pronto (Uk 1mb version) and have extolled its virtues (ok
bored
> him) to the point hes convinced. The only question is now which
model.....
>=20
> He feels the normal pronto is a little big and lacks hard buttons.
> Neo is slightly limited in terms of software and availableity of
example
> (n)cf files
> New RU-950 is too expensive.
>=20
> So the actual question is, how limited in terms of programming is the
NEO
> compared to the Pronto - what *can't* you do ?
>=20
> Is there anything else in the sub =A3150 bracket worth considering ?
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Dean
>=20
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>=20
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>=20