[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Midband :(
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Midband :(
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:55:54 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> With no D-Channel available, Midband looked shaky. With a connection
time
> cap, it's a joke. Precisely what is the difference between highway and
> midband?
Given the current evidence I have to agree with you and I was just
talking on IRC about this very thing, exactly what is the difference?
And if there is no difference why should or indeed, would, I want to pay
more for it?
> I wish they had just spent the money on a few more dslams, rather than
> wasting everyone's time with this ISDN re-badge.
Yup!
> An interesting note: Spellcheck suggested "misbrand" as an
alternative
to
> "midband". ;)
LOL, more accurate in this case I think.
K.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|