|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: [OT] : Proof that the world has gone insane... |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: FIRM Pics + Questions
Hi,
>> What do you mean by multi command sequence? Multiple commands
transmitted
in
>> a sequence? If yes, then I'm not aware of such remotes...
> This may not be what was meant but is similar - I have a remote
(Sanyo)
> which sends an initial command followed by a generic repeat signal
within
a
> time frame.
This kind of commands are supported.... Some of the presaved codes in
the
configuration file are for such type of remotes....they are under the
NEC
generic protocol, with only the sync bit repeated, not the whole code
sequence.
> So you get using volume for example a single long space coded
>signal meaning vol down or up then a short repeat signal saying to the
unit
> more of the first command. The start bit lengths are noticeably
longer
> using this remote than any other I have e.g. Sony etc.
Sony use another type of coding, based on a 4T start bit and then the
code
as '01' for a '0' and '011 for a '1'.
The sync code is repeated together with the data bits.
My application supports any variant fo the three main generic
protocols:
NEC, SONY and RC5, so you can have even more bits than standard (just
an
example: on TV remote, all the commands are 12 bit, just the 16:9 command
is
on 15 bits)
NEC protocol usualy have 16/32/48 bits, with sync repeated, command
without
sync repeated and other combinations.
> This is not that uncommon and I have seen reference to it on the
web
>although I don't remember where.
You're right, but..I repeat... my application can handle all of them
under
the 3 generic protocols. You must think to "NEC" as all protocols
based on 0
level bit information, SONY as the one for 1 level bit information and
RC5
as based on fixed pulse length, bit information is based on transition
at
the middle of the bit.
More... you can automatically decode any command independent of the
generic
protocol used, if is stored in the configuration file.. you don't need
to
load a specific configuration file and then decode only that remote...all
of
them are there.
More, the learning procedure is based on analyzis, not on RAW data saved,
so
the command generated during the send procedure is with the same accuracy
as
the original one and more... you can generate new commands, not learned,
by
directly changing the data bits. More.. you can generate even other kinds
of
signals, like X10 (mains), X10 (radio) and customs signals using the
same
application.
I hope that I was clear enough, again with my poor english..
:-)
Dan
HTH
Ian
Ian Bird
CibaVision UK Ltd.
Direct dial 01489 775570
Fax 01489
779570
"Dan"
<dtoma@xxxxxxx>
To:
<ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:
25/10/02 12:38
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] FIRM
Pics + Questions
Please respond to
ukha_d
Hi Shane,
As part of the questions are related to my application (IRM).. I'll try
to
answer you:
> Now the serial interface board actually has to decode the IR (HV
used to
do that
> for you) and generate an ASCII command string - is that right ?
> Actually I guess what would make it clearer to me is the serial to
PC
> protocol if you are willing to release it.
The signal decoding is now a PC task, inside the IRM application
> Finally - what are the limitations of FirM that you are aware
of. I am
> a newbie to IR and a bit confused but have thoughts like:
>1) Different remotes use different frequencies - any problem ?
For the moment the application is compatible only with the remotes using
a
carrier between 30-40KHz. The old ITT ones, using small pulses and no
carrier ar not supported. Anyway, I think that the majority of the
actual
remotes use a carrier.
> 2) Some keys send multi command sequences etc - any problem ?
What do you mean by multi command sequence? Multiple commands
transmitted
in
a sequence? If yes, then I'm not aware of such remotes...Anyway, the
application is able then to consider the multicommand sequence as a
single
command, so is not a problem... Please give me more details about this
type
of remotes and I will take care of...
Best regards,
Dan
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|