The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Audiotron Wifi



On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, BUTLER, Tony, FM wrote:

> Ah, so the user IQ too low factor strikes again :-/

No, customers are always right. :-)

> I hope you charged him suitably for this, but I know you don't do that kinda
> thing.

No.

> So now _you_ have a paperweight or it costs you to send to HPT for
> fixing :( Presumably they either reflash the machine in a *special*
> way, or just replace the eprom with a kosher one?

That's the way it goes. The customer didn't intend on killing the
AudioTron but wanted the latest and greatest firmware (v3.0.1 beta). It
would cost us to return the unit to Danmark and, presumably, from Danmark
to the U.S. Once repaired, a similar charge is applicable among the
distribution chain.

My understanding is that if the firmware is corrupted during the flash
upgrade process, the unit must be sent back to Turtle Beach for factory
reset. I believe that the flash EPROM is "surface mounted" on the PCB and
cannot be changed.

> Either way, they should provide the retailer with a means to repair it
> themselves.....

As you have mentioned before, the flashing process going wrong is
relatively rare so please don't have nightmares.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.