|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: =?UTF-8?Q?RE:_Re:_=5Bukha=5Fd=5D_Acer_Revo_3600'?= =?UTF-8?Q?s_for_=C2=A3130_inc_VAT?= |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: NOW: PIRs WAS: Stair Mats
Hi Ken + Mark
The best way of detecting someone with a pir is to
position it so that they walk across the sensor and not into it . I use
Pulnix Sensors ceiling mount and very good..Some have pulse count links
on
them so you can set it up to alarm after say 2 counts or 4.....If using
for
occupancy as only then a 2 pulse count is better...There are
two types of
lenses ( im aware of) Freznel and mirror......the mirror is supposed to
be
better than the freznel......Another good detector is one made in Italy
i
believe by a company i think called Alarmcom.................
HTH
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Watt" <kwatt@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:09 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOW: PIRs WAS: Stair Mats
> > OK - what do you find the most reliable in the way of PIRs,
then?
>
> The ones I got from Simon at Ecolume are superb for occupancy
detection
> (which reminds me to talk to him actually) they are the ceiling
mounted
> ones very, very good PIRs.
>
> The "pet immune" ones are virtually useless for occupancy,
but if you
> have pets then there are not a lot of options there.
>
> The "mini-PIR" is okay, but not the best for occupancy.
>
> I got some cheapo ones from B&Q [you should try that shop! :D]
that work
> very well indeed, but usual B&Q no-name stuff.
>
> I also got some from a local supplier which were made by Honeywell
and
> these are excellent for occupancy as well. These are also like
normal
> PIRs but seem to be more sensitive than the others, whilst retaining
the
> "normal" PIR mounting and, more importantly, wiring.
>
> The one huge caveat with PIRs in general is positioning IME, if they
are
> not positioned correctly then they won't work. By that the I include
the
> direction they are aimed in, the height and what kind of room/area
they
> are in, often in larger rooms and especially hallways more than one
is
> needed to give reliable coverage. Obviously if positioning is an
issue
> then the more sensitive you can get the PIR the better.
>
> HTH
>
> K.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
| |
|
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|