The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: =?UTF-8?Q?RE:_Re:_=5Bukha=5Fd=5D_Acer_Revo_3600'?= =?UTF-8?Q?s_for_=C2=A3130_inc_VAT?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NOW: PIRs WAS: Stair Mats



Hi Ken + Mark
                        The best way of detecting someone with a pir is to
position it so that they walk across the sensor and not into it . I use
Pulnix Sensors ceiling mount and very good..Some have pulse count links on
them so you can set it up to alarm after say 2 counts or 4.....If using for
occupancy as  only then a 2 pulse count  is better...There are two types of
lenses ( im aware of) Freznel and mirror......the mirror is supposed to be
better than the freznel......Another good detector is one made in Italy i
believe by a company i think called Alarmcom.................

HTH

Frank



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Watt" <kwatt@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:09 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOW: PIRs WAS: Stair Mats


> > OK - what do you find the most reliable in the way of PIRs, then?
>
> The ones I got from Simon at Ecolume are superb for occupancy detection
> (which reminds me to talk to him actually) they are the ceiling mounted
> ones very, very good PIRs.
>
> The "pet immune" ones are virtually useless for occupancy, but if you
> have pets then there are not a lot of options there.
>
> The "mini-PIR" is okay, but not the best for occupancy.
>
> I got some cheapo ones from B&Q [you should try that shop! :D] that work
> very well indeed, but usual B&Q no-name stuff.
>
> I also got some from a local supplier which were made by Honeywell and
> these are excellent for occupancy as well. These are also like normal
> PIRs but seem to be more sensitive than the others, whilst retaining the
> "normal" PIR mounting and, more importantly, wiring.
>
> The one huge caveat with PIRs in general is positioning IME, if they are
> not positioned correctly then they won't work. By that the I include the
> direction they are aimed in, the height and what kind of room/area they
> are in, often in larger rooms and especially hallways more than one is
> needed to give reliable coverage. Obviously if positioning is an issue
> then the more sensitive you can get the PIR the better.
>
> HTH
>
> K.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx >
> List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.