RE: Kat5 clone.....!

["BUTLER, Tony, FM" <roaming@xxxxxxx>]

> "Totally passive and requiring no power supply; the S-Video 
> Baluns can save
> a significant portion of the cabling cost in point-to-point
S-Video
> connections, without sacrificing picture quality."
> 
> KAT5 is active in that it requires a PSU - so I'd argue that KAT5
is
> different (and superior).

I like the KAT5 units and will continue to buy them and indeed the
switcher
when it arrives.
I'd agree that it is different, if for no other reason than it is active
as
opposed to passive, however this does not IMO make it necessarily
superior.
Both pretty much claim not to sacrifice picture quality - I'd go along
with
this for KAT5 having the units myself, but does anyone actually know if
the
baluns are any better/worse/the same?

T.


********************************************************************
      Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
The Royal Bank of Scotland is registered in Scotland No 90312
Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB
Regulated by the Financial Services Authority
********************************************************************

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.