RE: OT £2500 for a Plasma

["Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@xxxxxxx>]

LOL!

I did wonder if that was the case...

Paul G.



>From: "Andy Bovingdon" <bov@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT £2500 for a Plasma
>Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:47:46 +0100
>
>
>Pixels are just a bit wider that's all.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 08 October 2002 11:35
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT £2500 for a Plasma
> >
> >
> > Now, this may be a *really stupid* question, (you can berate me
> > publicly if
> > so), but I'm gonna ask it anyway...
> >
> > Is that Panasonic TH-42PHD5 widescreen?
> >
> > If so, how does the 1024x768 ratio work? - I thought that
resolution
> > was for a standard 4:3 ratio
> >
> > How does it have that as it's native panel resolution, and be a
> > widescreen
> > display?
> >
> > Paul G.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Timothy Morris"
<timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > >To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT £2500 for a Plasma
> > >Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:22:46 +0100
> > >
> > >The new Panasonic TH-42PHD5 does 1024x768 (for the reason you
state I
> > >think) for 3.5k - check out the ivojo link I posted
earlier...
> > >
> > >It's more than just contrast (though the AI intensity does
help), the
> > >Panasonic can display more grey levels (per colour cell) than
any other
> > >plasma. This means it can also display significantly more
colours, so
> > >you don't get banding in colour fades. That is why the image
of the
> > >Panasonic displays look so much more 3 dimensional.
> > >
> > >The built in scalar also does a very good job of taking a
standard pal
> > >or ntsc image and de-interlacing it.
> > >
> > >Tim.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andy Bovingdon [mailto:bov@xxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: 08 October 2002 11:10
> > > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT £2500 for a Plasma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I'm going to save more then I'd get one with higher
resolution.
> > > > The Panasonic 42 inch has good contrast but still only
does low
> > > > res. If I get one with 1280x768 I can share the video
scalar I
> > > > use for the main cinema room - that's my ideal.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> > > > > Sent: 08 October 2002 11:05
> > > > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT £2500 for a Plasma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Its alright, but see one side by side with a
Panasonic, and I know
> > >that
> > > > > you'll be spending an extra few months saving...
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim.
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > List of UKHA Groups here -
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>




_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com