The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: THX and music replay...


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: THX and music replay...
  • From: "Phillip Harris" <phil@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:42:14 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 09 November 2002 17:35
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx > Subject: [ukha_d] THX and music replay...
>
>
> It does strike me that the criticism of THX "because it
> sounds pants for music" is a bit like criticising an MPV
> because it doesn't have great torque.
>
> THX effectively says "this amplifier has a set of
> characteristics - these characteristics were specially
> developed for one specific purpose - that of watching
> multi-channel movies."
>
> If you take a device specifically designed to do one thing,
> and do it well, it's a bit unfair to use it for something
> completely different and claim that the design is
> fundamentally flawed.
>
>
> No-one seems to find it strange if a household has a saloon
> and a two-seater sports car in the garage. No-one has a
> problem understanding that you use the saloon for the school
> run, and the two-seater for a blast at weekends... the reason
> people do this is that saloons with sports car performance
> are phenomenally expensive compared to having two, more
> specialised cars. (Seating capacity of a Rover 75 plus
> performence of a Lotus Elise =3D Bentley Arnage.)
>
> Why can't people accept that having two different systems -
> one optimised for playing stereo music, one optimised for
> playing surround sound - is no different.
>
>
> I have a movie system - it uses a THX processor, and a THX
> power amp for the main channels. It sounds excellent for movies.
>
> I have a music system - it uses a stereo pre-amp, no
> surround, optimised for stereo, and a power amp optimised for
> music. It sounds excellent for music.
>
>
> Now, I realise that budget, and space are constraints for all
> of us, but even if money were no object, then I'd still want
> a separate system using Meridian 800 series stuff for cinema,
> and Chord stero stuff for music. Likewise, if money were no
> object, I'd have Linn Sondek CD12 for playing CDs - ANY DVD
> player in the world sounds "pants" compared to that... but <= BR> > =A312,000 for a CD player is kind of obsessive, considering
> that you could get a might cinema system for that :-)
>
>
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.ya= hoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/



http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.