RE: Webcams

["Gerard McGovern" <stuff@xxxxxxx>]

> Isn't wireless more likely to be hacked, so hacker can see
> into your home, or you're not too bothered? Wireless is 
> easier to install, I suppose (no ethernet cable), but you 
> still need to provide power supply cable. Is that your 
> reasoning for wireless? Nik

I think you've hit the nail on the head there ... if you are running
power, why not just run Cat5 as well?

Wireless may be cool but wireless for wireless sake is just a waste.
Where it would be useful it to monitor your shed/garage etc where you
would just have power and nothing else. For a home however, I can't see
a point.

G

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.