|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Audiotron vs Rio Receiver - Round 2
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Audiotron vs Rio Receiver - Round 2
- From: "Dr John Tankard" <john@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 17:12:39 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Today I hooked both the Rio and the Audiotron up to my
> Parasound ZAmp to even up the testing - as a =A3250 amp vs
> whatever pants is in the Rio isn't really fair.....
>
Tony,
Thanks for the review.
If I had the money spare I would be tempted, just for the better looks
:-)
I am not sure how many people are using the DDAR with its built in amp,
I have three and they are all playing through the external amp. The
size
is not a issue to me it was the cost, and at the time I could not get
the AudioT, I tried but failed, now I have got DDAR's I don=92t want to
have to have more than one server side component, its nice a simple.
When JR is a little more sorted I will switch to that on a L box, but
for now I am happy
Once again thanks for taking the time to compare the systems.
John
For more information: http://www=
.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|