|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: If you read this in the next 30 minutes... |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: BT Satellite - sharing the connection
On 21 May 2002, at 15:54, Roger wrote:
> A friend of mine is trying to get this idea to work at the
moment...
> Seeing him in the pub tonight, so will report back if he made it
work.=
> I think that it should.
Very interested in this myself as Satellite may be my own last
best hope (but definitely only after exhausting a few other
possibilities I've got at the moment).
I'm only interested in something that I can access from multiple
PCs and always assumed this would be possible with Satellite,
despite only choosing the Business Satellite 500/1 option rather
than the pricey 500/4 option.
Wasn't there talk of a Home Satellite option a while ago for =A3650
(equipment + install) vs the Business option of =A3900?
I noted on the ISDN page that "application acceptance subject to
survey" which I just *know* is going to be the get-out that'll
prevent BT supplying me with a service. Still, it's worth a punt, I'm
that desperate.
Stuart
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: psghome2002 [mailto:psghome@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 21 May 2002 14:16
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: [ukha_d] BT Satellite - sharing the connection
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know there's been some discussion about the BT Satellite
servic=
e
> > recently. I'm missing my old Cable Modem connection from my
old
> > house so much that I've decided to go for the Satellite option
(m=
y 4
> > channels of ISDN are costing a fortune too).
> >
> > BT offer a single connection Satellite modem or 4 connection
> > Satellite router option. Now, I used to use a Linksys
cable/DSL
> > router (which I still have). I believe the satellite modem
offers=
> > USB or Ethernet connection. Is there any reason why I can't use
t=
his
> > router (or even buy another different router) to connect to
the
> > satellite modem and share the connection via NAT?
> >
> > If so, it'd save =A3400 installation and =A350 per month!
--
Stuart Booth
Somewhere in Buckinghamshire, England, UK
stuart@xxxxxxx
Yahoo! Groups
Spons=
or |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www=
.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|