[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: RS232/482 Qs
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: RS232/482 Qs
- From: "Kevin Hawkins" <lists@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 15:44:48 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Tim, what actually is the distance you are
talking
about going to work out at ?
Most alarm systems use 485 for their comms what
system
is it ? On some systems e.g. Comfort you can separate the RS232 from the
panel
and the connection works over very long distances and has error checking
built
in.
RS232 is quite flexible and at low speeds the
distances it can run on are much higher. I would suggest you measure the
distances involved and make up a cable and try it - that way you will know
if it
is going to be a problem in advance - even better make it up much longer
and
then you have some level for error.
Perhaps most importantly is there an error checking
protocol running on the RS232 ?? and/or is it a 'critical' link in terms of
data
integrity ?
At a previous company following the acquisition of an
adjacent building we had VT100 terminal attached to a Vax
'mainframe/mini'
running over 250m at 9600 baud - we did not notice any problems but it is
way
outside the spec. My Slink-E connection here is a good 75m
too.
If you embed cables and you use twisted pair of some
form
then you could later switch from RS232 to 485 if problems occurred. You
need to
check how many wires are required for both the RS232 and the 485
connection. The
RS232 will be somewhere between 3 minimum, 6 or 7 typically and lots in a
very
complex (rare) situation. The RS485 will require a couple more due to the
twisted pairs. It also may be a separate transmit and receive pair or in
some
cases a more complex shared pair.
Perhaps someone else can put in their view on
shielding -
in one sense it cuts down on noise on the link, adding to the distance
possible
but in another it adds to the capacitance which adversely effects the
distance
particularly at high data rates, although 9600 is not very high. Is the
locality
of the cable electrically noisy ?
Kevin
No, It's just for the link between the
PC
and the HA controller/Alarm system. I need to spec the stuff to go in
the
walls, I presume a standard 4/8 core shielded cable will be more than
adequate?
Tim.
-----Original Message----- From:
PatrickLidstone [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx] Sent: 11 May 2002
13:49 To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: [ukha_d] Re: RS232/482 Qs
PS. If
this run is going outside, for CCTV camera control or whatever, I'd use
external line drivers for lightning
protection...
Patrick
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Height: |
4
5
6
7
ft
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
in |
Weight: |
|
Sex: |
F
M |
| |
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|