RE: RE: gf3->Biostar mther->KT133 hassle OT

["Bricknell, Tony" <tony.bricknell@xxxxxxx>]

Original msg arrived here without the [ukha_d] in the subject too -
strange.
Seem to get about one ukha_d message like this a day.  Never could
work out
why...

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Calum Morrell [mailto:calum@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 May 2002 13:32
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] RE: gf3->Biostar mther->KT133 hassle OT


On 8 May 2002 at 12:48, Gerard McGovern wrote:
> > what runaround i have been having
> 
> how is it that this post doesn't have [ukha_d] in the subject???

it does here, it also has OT to make it clear it's not ha related ...
although 
could you put the OT at the start of the message in future please Amar? Not
everyone allows as much space as I do for the subject in my inbox ;-)

--
Calum Morrell
http://www.drochaid.org




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.