|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: (ukha_d) OT: Rio delivery |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cabling Question
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Cabling Question
- From: "Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 18:49:34 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Keith,
I have a question, if you don't mind.. when talking about the seperation
of
LV and Mains, especially having no LV and Mains in the same pattress
box,
what if the reason for the LV cabling is to provide a data/control
interface
for the Mains side? an example would be a wired RS-232 controlled
dimmer
pack...
I think what I'm getting at, is when does the regs stop thinking of
something as being part of the infrastructure, and when does it become
an
appliance?
do the regs effectively stop you from building LV controlled units which
fit
inside a pattress box as a "wall switch" ?
Ian.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|