|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: OT - XP Pro and dual processors |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micromodules....
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Micromodules....
- From: Nic Blinston <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 10:16:43 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Again I can think of examples, e.g. safety. An unattended iron that
>is switched on is a fire risk. Having the house turn everything off
>when noone is in or after a period of being on would help prevent
>accidents.
I go along with this to a point, but I would be worried to think
people might start to rely on the module NOT being accidentally
triggered.
The suggestion to build a dedicated (lack of) motion sensor in to an
iron is a far more appropriate means of achieving the same end.
The vacuum cleaner being silenced by the doorbell or phone however is
a very valid use of X-10. Presumably there'd be no need to have the
system switch the module back on, since the action of flipping the
hoover's power switch off and on again would reset it?
>That's a brilliant idea. It would be a piece of weewee to replace the
plug
>with a plug-in PSU type case with the module inside.
Just as long as you make it the type with a brass earth pin...
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|