|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT Raid Setup for MP3 Server
No answers to this interesting thread(sorry) - just some additional
questions...
1. Do the previous comments on disc speed apply if distributing
uncompressed audio around a LAN? I'd like to be able to put out up
to 4 (possibly more) streams simultaneously (I'm still trying to oust
Linn from the rip-off high-quality multi-room market).
2. I'm planning to dedicate a server to this task (which puts
uncompressed audio out to the LAN and has a touchscreen in each room
(for control) connected to client PC which also outputs to local
digital amplifier/spkrs. Anybody have any idea what sort of
processor this would take?
Thanks
Ben
>
> > I did make an error in my previous post, with 2 x 80 and 1 x 60
it is
> 120Gb logical disk I have and not 140Gb. This means that if I
swapped
> the 60Gb for another 80Gb then I would gain (following a rebuild)
> 40Gb on the logical disk which is tempting.
>
> For those who are interested, I have the following card:
>
> http://www.dabs.com/products/prod-info3-info.asp?&m=y&quicklinx=14Q6
>
> which has 6 connectors, can support disks larger than 137Gb, is
> ATA100 and comes with 6 cables and 3 hot swap caddies for 310 quid
> plus VAT.
>
> As I will now have to plan an upgrade of the server anyway, and I
> will have serveral disks lying about when I do it, is there a real
> benefit in separating the OS from the data. The reason I went with
> raid 5 in the first place was for resilliance of the OS (in this
case
> SBS2K so it includes Exchange, IIS, SQL) following a 'disaster'
where
> a hard disk failed and wiped out my server. I now have everything
on
> one raid 5 'disk' but I could set up the future system to have 2 x
> 80Gb mirrored for the SBS2K components and then 3 (or 4) x 160Gb
> disks on raid 5 array for data (mainly MP3 and in future divx).
>
> Does this give significant benefit (there is no additional cost as
I
> have the smaller disks already) or would I be better off just
putting
> everything on raid 5 as I do at the moment.
>
> Finally (sorry if this has been answered and I missed it), can
disks
> be added to an existing raid 5 array after it has been set up and
> data is on it? I suspect now that the answer is no, but it is worth
> asking. Quite simply, I can afford to buy 3 disks sooner than 4!
>
> Regards
>
> Graham
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|