[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
- From: "Roger" <roger@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:07:20 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
All devices seem to be going this way... it is much easier to configure any
device via a web page, rather than by some microscopic setup buttons,
switches, etc, then of course you can start building virtual control panels
using XML to control the functions - preferably via a wireless device such
as an IPAQ, etc
IPV6 will (hopefully) fix the latency problems
Roger Shingler
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Doxey [mailto:lists.diyha@xxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Keith
Doxey
Sent: 26 March 2002 13:22
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
Amplifiers may well become IP devices.
Pro Audio is already taking that route.
http://mediamatrix.peavey.com/
<http://mediamatrix.peavey.com/>
http://www.bss.co.uk/soundweb/mainpage.htm
<http://www.bss.co.uk/soundweb/mainpage.htm>
Whilst they currently use dedicated networks to connect devices, full IP
connectivity is the next logical step.
Crestron and AMX used to be remotely configurable via a dial up modem, they
are now Internet enabled. HomeVision has also taken that route so it will
only be a matter of time before Consumer electronics follows. Get the CAT5
installed NOW :-)
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk
www.kat5.tv
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 March 2002 11:32
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
Tony,
I don't know that I agree.
At the moment, I use CAT5 cabling to do things like run the _rear_
outputs from my Dolby Digital decoder round to the rear amplifier and
speakers. For this, obviously, I use KAT5.
I _don't_ see that things like amplifiers will become IP devices...
Granted, I could, even today, take the rear-channel out as an SP/DIF
stream, and pipe that to a DAC at the other end. I'm even willing to
believe that I could do this on a LAN... but would it be sensible?
Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher
-----Original Message-----
From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 March 2002 11:13
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
Yeah, but it's more fun to take the mick :)
As for the sports vs estate comparison.
ATM perhaps, but with 802.11a etc just around the corner, the will be
less
and less difference speed wise between the two - indeed many corporate
lans
limit workstations to 10mb links anyway, which 802.11g exceeds
Of course, I am only taking about data networks here - not wireless
alarms
etc, which is a whole other ball game.
_one_ day, everything will be an internet device with it's own IPNG
address,
connecting via secure wired/wireless link to the home lan. _then_ there
will be no need for wired vs wireless arguments.......
Tony
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 26 March 2002 11:05
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
>
>
> Doh!!!!
>
> Never mind, you all knew what I meant ;-)
>
> CAT5 vs. WireLESS
>
> Mark Harrison
> Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 26 March 2002 11:02
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] CAT5 vs. Wired
>
>
> > Increasingly, I think that we'll see the whole CAT5 vs.
> Wired argument
> > as an "estate cars vs. sports cars" argument, in the
sense that:
>
> err...mmmm.... CAT5 _is_ wired!!!??? :)
>
> Tony
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
<http://www.rbsmarkets.com>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
> As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
> if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
> retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
> ********************************************************************
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
> service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus
> service working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
<http://www.messagelabs.com>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> FREE COLLEGE MONEY
> CLICK HERE to search
> 600,000 scholarships!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/IBOolB/TM
<http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/IBOolB/TM>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
<http://www.messagelabs.com>
________________________________________________________________________
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|