|
|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
- From: "Keith Doxey" <lists.diyha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:18:18 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Thats one more reason in favour of CAT5.
Because it is a balanced circuit any radiation that does get emitted is
equal but OPPOSITE from each wire and therefore will cancel out.
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk
www.kat5.tv
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
Hmmm
I have one thing to add to the CAT-5 vs Wireless debate: Cancer and
Leukemia.
I'm amazed that people have so little problems with throwing 2.4Ghz
around
the house.
That's *MICROWAVES* for goodness sakes. Inverse Square Law and all
that???
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|