The congested
bandwidth argument doesn't apply to RF as whole. To the 2.4 GHz range, yes,
but
not to RF as a whole.
Cat5 is great
but
not always practical. Most houses in the UK only have wireless systems as
an
option because laying cable is impossible or very unsightly. On this point,
why
don't all new homes come with Cat5 prewired? It's shockingly simple and so
cheap.
Just a quick
aside,
why does no-one use the privacy argument with DECT handsets but always does
with
wireless LANs?
G
I
refer to many previous postings extolling the virtues of CAT5 cable over RF
connectivity.
RF's
major benefit is No cable required but the devices need to obtain power
from
somewhere either expensive batteries or mains power via a
cable.
RF's
major drawbacks......
Congested bandwidth
lack
of privacy
susceptible to interference.
Get
the CAT5 cable installed and use WIRED solutions.
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk www.kat5.tv
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|