[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
(OT ST Nonsense - not to be confused with the OT XML nonsense) WAS Re:
RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: (OT ST Nonsense - not to be confused with the OT XML
nonsense) WAS Re: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
- From: "andy_powell_is" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:44:53 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I defer to your greater sandness :P
Andy
[End Transmission]
--- In ukha_d@y..., "BUTLER, Tony, FM" <tony.butler@r...>
wrote:
>
> > interference. hence as Tim says RGB and SVideo timing issues
>
> That was me said that. tv & sky rgb timing issues, not rgb &
svideo.
> methinks you have drunk too much bloodwine old boy!
>
> > Andy
> >
> > [Somebody shoot me now]
>
> (They'll run out of bullets before they get to you m8 - they've
gotta do me
> first :0)
>
> >
> > --- In ukha_d@y..., "Timothy Morris"
<timothy.morris@i...> wrote:
> > > That maybe the case, but when was the last time you
re-aligned
your
> > warp
> > > coils, or your di-lithium matrix for that matter.
> > >
> > > Both of these are known to affect RGB and SVideo timing.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx...]
> > > Sent: 18 March 2002 15:20
> > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
> > >
> > > Errrrr...yes indeedy, sorry I didn't realise my
"witty" retort
had
> > to be
> > > so
> > > EXACTLY matched to the first one. I think you'll find
neither
> > > technology
> > > has any great bearing on 21st Century TV outputs though :-P
> > >
> > > M.
> > >
> > >
> > > > <SAD GIT>
> > > > I know that this makes me a really sad person but a
Heisenberg
> > > > compensator is used in transporter mechanisms, tachyon
pulse's are
> > > > not - the technologies are used for different things...
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > > ... note the deliberate lack of </SAD GIT>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall"
<mark@a...> wrote:
> > > > > I tried that, but my Heisenberg Compensator seems
to be on
the
> > > > blink ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > M.
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: BUTLER, Tony, FM
> > > > > To: 'ukha_d@y...'
> > > > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:17 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It's due to an incompatibility with sychronising
pulses
> > between
> > > > the TV and thed igibox.
> > > > > Try an inverse tachyon pulse or a multi-phasic
spread to
cure
> > > > it :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > > Post message: ukha_d@y...
> > > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> > > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> > > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > Post message: ukha_d@y...
> > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ---------------------~-->
> > Buy Stock for $4.
> > No Minimums.
> > FREE Money 2002.
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/IBOolB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------~->
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@y...
> > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
> As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
> if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
> retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
> ********************************************************************
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|