[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
- From: "Ben McCormack" <ben.mccormack@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:47:01 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
To add to this, my friend did not use a Panasonic box, he was using a
Grundig box when he tested it
-----Original Message-----
From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 March 2002 11:45
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
As you say though ben, you have the panny too whereas Tim has a pace
box. different manufacturers....different components.... panny must be
using pulls or something:-<
Tony
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben McCormack [mailto:ben.mccormack@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 18 March 2002 11:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
>
>
> I am not sure what is going on as well
>
> The TV is brand new as well as the Sky box, but as I said a friend of
> mine who is a profesional installer and dealer also tested the same
> setup and came to the same conclusion.
>
> Baffles me as well
>
> ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 18 March 2002 11:34
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
>
>
> That certainly doesn't tally with my experience. Composite from my 1st
> generation Pace box is noticeably inferior to RGB (and was with my
> Philips 32" WS)
>
> Tim.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben McCormack [mailto:ben.mccormack@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 18 March 2002 11:29
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
>
> Hi
>
> I have found that there is no difference between Sky Digital Composite
> and RGB.
>
> I have got a Loewe Ergo 28" and Panasonic Sky digital box and I
was
> using good quality SCART leads.
>
> I spoke to a HiFi dealer friend of mine who tested the same theory and
> he agreed that there was no difference, he suggested that is was to do
> with the quality of converters on the Sky box.
>
> Not sure what to make of it all
>
> Regards
>
> ben
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> Buy Stock for $4.
> No Minimums.
> FREE Money 2002.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/IBOolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
********************************************************************
Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, if
you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to retain, read,
copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|