[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
- From: "Ben McCormack" <ben.mccormack@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:36:17 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I am not sure what is going on as well
The TV is brand new as well as the Sky box, but as I said a friend of
mine who is a profesional installer and dealer also tested the same
setup and came to the same conclusion.
Baffles me as well
ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 March 2002 11:34
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
That certainly doesn't tally with my experience. Composite from my 1st
generation Pace box is noticeably inferior to RGB (and was with my
Philips 32" WS)
Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben McCormack [mailto:ben.mccormack@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 March 2002 11:29
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RGB to SVideo vs KAT5
Hi
I have found that there is no difference between Sky Digital Composite
and RGB.
I have got a Loewe Ergo 28" and Panasonic Sky digital box and I was
using good quality SCART leads.
I spoke to a HiFi dealer friend of mine who tested the same theory and
he agreed that there was no difference, he suggested that is was to do
with the quality of converters on the Sky box.
Not sure what to make of it all
Regards
ben
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|