The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Fw: Compaq Fingerprint drivers


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mini mobos



> > > http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/computing/5868.shtml
> >
> > It's a nice machine, but the CPU/case fan is very noisy.  Not
> > the kind of thing to sit in your hifi rack unobtrusively.
> > Aside from that, it's quite cool though.
>
> Yes, the demo units I saw a few months back were damn noisy. Shame
> really because as you said, a very cool little machine.
>
> If only the guys from Apple were involved because I'm sure they could
> make them very quiet indeed.

I doubt it.  The problem is, it has to dissipate a certain amount of heat
>from
amount of heat it has to dissipate, or to make it larger.  As the idea is
to
keep it small, you need to reduce the heat it needs to dissipate.  I can
think of a few ways of doing this.  All of them reduce performance.  I
think
the best way would be to retrofit a 900MHz Via C3 chip.  This dissipates
around 11W compared to 20W (ish) from the Celeron 1GHz.  I guesstimate that
you'd be able to reduce fan speed and get rid of most of that noise.

I've not had a look inside, but ducting of the air may also help.  It
originally came out back in late 2000, so the technology is quite dated. 
Of
course, if they re-release it with up-to-date technology, it may be a very
cool (pun intended!) item.

Andy
--
PC-Based Multimedia System
http://www.andylaurence.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pcbmms
Get paid to receive SMS
http://www.dynamicsms.com.au/intro.asp?ref=07789817509&refc=429


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.