-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard McGovern
[mailto:stuff@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 March 2002 13:16
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT:
Memory
and Windows XP
Essentially it depends what you
are
going to be running a day to day basis. You right on the 128 to 256 front
...
that does make a big difference. Going past that, it is down to what you
will
be doing with your system.
I'm sitting here with 1.5 GB of
RAM
under XP and sometimes even that isn't enough. But I'm running Premiere,
HomeSite, Photoshop, IE, PC Anywhere, Maya and Outlook all at the same
time;
not your average user.
If you need any more advice,
let me
know.
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morris
[mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 March 2002 1:06
pm
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] OT: Memory
and
Windows XP
I know from experience that
upgrading from 128 to 256Mb makes a big difference to Windows XP
performance
(especially if you tweak the cache settings). Does anyone have personal
experience (rather than anecdotal evidence) of going from 256 to
512?
Is it worth doing? The only
reason I
ask is that I run a high FSB on my system, and as a result the memory
needed to
do this (2700DDR RAM) comes in at just over a hundred quid a
stick).
Tim
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use
of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use
of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.