[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: cat5
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: cat5
- From: "ianwbird" <Ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:06:30 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I should have read the length a little more carefully but I was in a
rush this morning to get my nipper to school. Even though I wrote
100m I THOUGHT 305. Didn't even know it was availalbe at less then
305m.
I'll shut up now in case I embarass myself further. I have also
binned the Maplin newsletter!
Ian
(at least I didn't buy one as well!!).
--- In ukha_d@y..., "James, Daniel" <daniel.james@e...>
wrote:
> Not bad for "e" then
>
> http://www.tlc-
direct.co.uk/Main_Index/Cable_Index/Computer/index.html
>
> Still a hell of a lot cheaper if you buy 305m though.
>
> Daniel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 28 February 2002 14:40
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] cat5
>
>
> DOH! - READ THE ORIGINAL POST FIRST YOU IDIOT!!
>
> Sorry! - however, the leaflet I have here in front of me says that
it *is*
> "e"
>
> Paul G.
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|