|
|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Multizone IR Control
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Multizone IR Control
- From: "Graham Howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 21:22:00 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Valid point, CT100 is a better screened cable but like you
> I've never done a comparison.
>
> On the other hand RG59 will take all the common connectors
> quite easily, which is more than can be said for CT100! :-)
>
> And RG59 is nice and cheap as well!
>
> Tracey
>
The big problem with CT100 is that it is quite stiff and can be
difficult to pull. I only use it for RF distribution so it is
terminated
with normal RF connectors at TVs, Videos and a home made patch pannel
all of which were quite easy. As for cost, to my mind cable is nothing
in comparison to the value of the equipment on the end of it and the
value of my time installing it! If you are only pulling cable once then
why not pay a little extra for the best (and of course pull a few extra
runs of everything!)
Graham
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|