RG59/CT100

["Tracey Gardner" <tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Bill

No, we're talking about different things.

I interpret the term Video to mean baseband video or composite video, (0
-
6MHz) whereas UHF or satellite signals are much higher in frequency and
therefore need a much lower loss cable like CT100..

RG59 will be morte than adequate for CCTV cabling but most certainly not
for
UHF and satellite downleads.

Tracey


> I assume, like myself, that since most SKY/Cable companies put in
> CT100 (= satellite cable) , it is safe to go with this when you
want
> to wire up your own dish, security cameras etc.  Its certainly
the
> way i had planned to go.
>
> Are you saying there`s something wrong here Tracey?




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.