|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: Remote Connection. |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Multizone IR Control
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Multizone IR Control
- From: "Graham Howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 20:36:33 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I think CT100 has superior shielding which can be an advantage in the
home environment where cables may well run close by mains cable.
However
I could be wrong, this is based upon partial memory of previous
discussions, I have never done a comparison myself.
Graham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tracey Gardner [mailto:tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 07 June 2002 20:11
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Multizone IR Control
>
>
> Hi Graham
>
> Why CT100 for video, after all baseband video isn't high
> frequency stuff?
>
> Personally I'd go for RG59 for distributing baseband video as
> it's smaller in diameter than RG6 and much more flexible.
>
> Tracey
> I
> > > think I understand how to distribute Video (RG-6), Sound
> (79 Strand
> > Cable)
> >
> > CT100 is prefered for Video
> >
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|