The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Re: Terminal Services - was Fast PCAnywhere equivalent


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Shuttle & via epia... now firewalls


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: Shuttle & via epia... now firewalls
  • From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:37:22 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Paul,
 
Personally, I would use another firewall between the SME server and you Internet link, rather than relying on the one in SME server. This firewall could happily run on a P-90 with 32Mb RAM, so hopefully should cost nothing. The linux "turnkey" firewalls, of which personally I consider IPCop the best, are really "plug and play" these days, and very straightforward to install.
 
You then allow access through port 80, mapped onto the Andromeda port.
 
The SME server than is able to be a server, and can allow the access to the files over NBT (the system used by Microsoft "shares") without getting worried about the security implications.
 
Running the SME server alone has two downsides:
 
1: The inherent problems of running other services on firewalls, long discussed
 
2: The fact that it's Microsoft - no this is not a Bill-bashing thing. The problem is that MS is too attractive a target, and there is a lot of hacker activity involved in finding new loopholes. As a result of that, it's pretty much a full-time job making sure you find, download and install every security patch MS launch. Worse than that, security patches aren't regression-tested, so installing one might stuff up something else (that's equally true for non-MS products, of course!) Service Packs ARE regression tested, but waiting till a patch is included in the next security patch can be too late.
 
 
 
However, as Tony says, it's all about acceptable risk. If the only data is your MP3s, and your photos (and none of the photos are things you would mind being distributed!), AND you are backing up your data directories, then it's probably OK. "OK" in the sense of, you may be prepared to accept the risk that some ne'er do well would steal and then trash your data.

In my case, I keep the accounts for my property business on the LAN, and I _am_ concerned about them getting out :-) Hence I adopt a more paranoid approach.
 
 
 
Mark
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Watkin [mailto:paul_watkin@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 11 July 2002 23:41
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Shuttle & via epia... now firewalls

Mark,
 
Following suggestions from the group I am trying to get to grips with SME server, this has the ability to act as a firewall/gateway webserver and also network server, which is how intend using it.
 
From what you and others have stated in this thread this seems a very bad idea :-(
 
Can anyone on the list tell me if it is possible (and how i do it!!) to have my MP3 collection and my photo album in an IBay on the SME server and have them accessible from my website (using Andromeda) as well as to my internal network as files (for audiotron winamp etc) without compromising the firewall??
 
Many thanks
 
Paul
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Shuttle & via epia... now firewalls

> >See Mark Harrison's post on what a firewall *should* look like.
> >_that_ is doing the job properly. Your £15 pc is not.
>
> Oh contraire, my £15 Linux based IPCop does a sparkling job...

Well, even Tony seems to accept that I know what I'm talking about
when it comes to Internet security :-)

Lee - I completely agree with you that IPCop is a very appropriate
security system for protecting a domestic network. The base data used
to calculate the complex bits of my tax returns is on my , and I'm
far more concerned about THAT being compromised than

Lee - I further agree with you that running additional services on it
does indeed compromise the security provided by exposing the kinds of
faults you describe.

Tony - I agree with you that a Via is an expensive overkill for a
domestic firewall. However, I don't think that the right answer is to
install other services on it. I'm sorry, but I have to say that doing
so creates security holes.

Regards,

Mark


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.