[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: OT - DVD writers
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: OT - DVD writers
- From: "Ray Barnett" <lists@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 14:26:03 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Mark,
Thanks
for the advice, but that's exactly what I do at the moment, and it's
exactly why
I now need a DVD writer. There is a flaw in the plan that is partly my
fault,
but probably inevitable no matter what...
I
was
backing up nightly all changed files from the hard drive on my main
machine, to
a second machine. However, periodically I do a "refresh" and make a fresh
copy
of all files to the backup machine - in order to clear out deleted files
etc.
At
some point a number of the 30MB scans I store on my drive have become
corrupted,
rendering them useless. I checked my backup drive, and the copies there
were
also corrupted and useless.
Consequently the only solution I see is proper
verified
archival backup onto either tape or DVD. DVD is winning at the moment down
to
cost and added benefits. Hard drive backup works out more expensive than
DVD as
soon as you want to keep more than one generation of backup, which I most
definitely do.
Accessing my source images is not a problem, since
I
will only need to access them if my main disk is corrupted, and I maintain
a
funky index of all photos online on my intranet - which was the main reason
for
scanning the photos in the first place.
Ray
Barnett
Ray,
If you requirement is
simply
backup for that kind of data volume, there's a more cost-effective, and
fast solution than either you propose.
A second PC (second-hand,
a
P2 would be fine), with a, say, 60Gb HDD in it, a couple of network
cards
and a crossover cable - and lo, your ideal backup solution for about
£200.
It's what I do at home for backup... it's also what we now do
at
work for long-term archiving of the digital images for the comet
website!
The cost equation of hardware was about the same, but once you took
into account the indexing problem (which CD is that photo on)... it
became an obvious thing to
do.
Regards,
Mark
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Ray
Barnett" <lists@t...> wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted
a
quick bit of advice since I gather some people here use them a >
fair bit... > > I urgently need to implement a backup system
capable of looking after my > rapidly growing 20GBs of digital
photos. > > Current favourites are a DVD writer or an Onstream
60GB tape thingy. > However, I've just confused myself over the
compatibilities of the various > DVD writers. Just how compatible
is
a DVD-R writer, and is it a dead duck > now that DVD+R is getting
more popular? > > Thanks, > > Ray
Barnett.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|