The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: iPaq stuff (was [OT] Nokia 6310i Opinions?)



I just bought one from www.pocketpctech.com - it was the $25 additional repair kit that they allowed me to buy without the standard kit at $50.  I paid with paypal and they only charged me $6 shipping.  (when it arrived the postage said $1.60 on it though!!!)  Expensive but cheaper than buying a 3 pack of stylii every few weeks.
 
Matthew
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: [ukha_d] iPaq stuff (was [OT] Nokia 6310i Opinions?)

Perhaps you can help then Gerard….

 

I need a replacement stylus retention device. It is a 2 minute job to replace, and it will cost more than a few quid to send it to Holland to have the same job done.

 

Are you able to source one for me?

 

Please?

 

Tim.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard McGovern [mailto:stuff@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 03 July 2002 11:10
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] Nokia 6310i Opinions?

 


All I will say is that it helps to have friends who work for Compaq :-)

G


 



For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.