The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: RE: Fire proofing Node 0 ?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RF interference


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: RF interference
  • From: "Chris Bond" <chris@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 09:11:40 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Forgot to meantion I had a lot of interference with my tivo and sky box
and dvd player and decent shielded cables solved the problem.

Another thing to note is make sure all devices are in a different RF.

Kind Regards,
Chris Bond
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bond [mailto:chris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 03 July 2002 9:09 AM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RF interference

Personal I'd get some decent IXOS Scart Leads to cut down the
interference.  They cost around =A335 for a .75 metre, sky.com had the= m
for sale on there the other week, alturnativly your local hifi shop
should have them.

Kind Regards,
Chris Bond
-----Original Message-----
From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 03 July 2002 8:58 AM
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: [ukha_d] RF interference

Until the KAt5 switcher puts in an appearance, my AV distribution about
the
house (apart from the lounge) is via RF.
As more items have been added, the signal quality has worstened, and
recently adding the TiVo has really shagged it.
To make matters worse, Tivo is set to record the terrestrial channels
from
the RF feed to minimise the possibility of it hogging the sky box when
recording.

BBC1, 2, ITV, C4 are fairly good, but C5 is really really poor with Tivo in
the chain (going from reasonable pic with wavey lines to very poor snowy pic
like reception is p*ss poor) and the Video and SKY RF feeds suffer badly too.
It's not Tivo being too close to C5's channel because I tried it on
Channel
69 and channel 21 with exactly the same results.
I assume therefore that Tivo (and to a lesser extent, the other devices) is
amplifiying/introducing a load of noise that is causing the interference rather than it being on too close a channel.

What do I do?  ISTR mention somewhere some time ago of signal
attenuators to
help such problems?
This being the case, should I put one between each source device or just on
the tivo (input or output?) and what 'strenght' would I need?


cheers,


Tony


********************************************************************
      Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************

For more information: http://www= .automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/



For more information: http://www= .automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/



Yahoo! Groups Spons= or

For more information: http://www= .automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.