The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home

Group Home

Search Archive
Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET

To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET
From: <umar@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:21:00 +0100
Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
References: <EOECKODLDIOIHMJAEHFMIENHDJAA.Ian@xxxxxxx> <008d01c21bbb$e23dcb10$0500a8c0@xxxxxxx> <gkvehukuhdru7s6rgj1hr2ipuphki8mpdk@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> > <chokes up his packet of crisps> !!! > > Holy cow, that's a pricey sticker on it ! Brings new meaning to > watching TV in the kitchen... > > Stuart > -- 200 quid off - what a bargain :-) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 13/06/2002
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Follow-Ups: Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET From: "Robert Crawshaw" <golcarbob@xxxxxxx> References: RE: domestic appliances review From: "Ian B" <Ian@xxxxxxx> Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET From: <umar@xxxxxxx> Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET From: Stuart Booth <lists@xxxxxxx> Prev by Date: Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET Next by Date: RE: FAO Mark McCall - Yahoo has me as bouncing Previous by thread: Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET Next by thread: Re: domestic appliances review - what a GADGET Index(es): Date Thread Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.