[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Sussed ! X10 Problems - it was the DDAR.
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Re: Sussed ! X10 Problems - it was the
DDAR.
- From: "Simon Coates" <ecolume@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:15:17 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- References: <a347ou+pvjf@xxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I wonder - is the DDAR emitting interference onto the mains and blocking
X10
signals, or is the DDAR's power supply blocking/absorbing interference and
'shorting' X10 signals? Maybe there's a cheaper solution than a FM10
filter.
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: PatrickLidstone <patrickl@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 28 January 2002 19:11
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Sussed ! X10 Problems - it was the DDAR.
> > I eventually got round to unplugging and testing all the modules
-
> and it
> > was the DDAR causing me the problems.
> >
> > So, I need a filter it seems. Anybody else had this with their
> DDAR ? Or
> > Rio for that matter.
>
> This is why they didn't pass CE certification, and couldn't be sold
> retail in the EU. (Or were never submitted for certification in the
> first place...)
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|