RE: Payments and Risk-Taking

["Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>]

Mick,

So in general you agree, then? ;-)
=20
Seriously - in general I think that the organiser should keep the money
as well (including a 10% contingency) - however, I'm aware that some
members of this group (you know who you are) have historically been very
reluctant to accept a profit or anything that looks like payment for
their time!!!! As such, I was suggesting that the organiser had free
rein on what they did, but that a "bar float out of a
contingency" might
be a nice alternative to a "at cost, but we all buy you a drink".
=20
Regards,

Mark Harrison=20
Head of Systems, eKingfisher=20

************************************************************************
****=20
Kingfisher plc=20
Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5PX

Registered in England, Number 1664812=20

This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed
and=20
may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the contrary,
any=20
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the

official view of the company.  If you have received this e-mail in
error,=20
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message=20
>from
disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for your
co-operation.=20
************************************************************************
****=20
=20=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Mick Furlong [mailto:hiltoneltd@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 January 2002 12:27
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Payments and Risk-Taking


=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 January 2002 12:10
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Payments and Risk-Taking


Some thoughts about payment and administration:

- The "charged" services like PayPal and NoChex are really
intended for
transferring money to people you don't know or trust. As such, you're
paying a premium for this.=20
=20
hmmm not  really the case unless you are using an escrow service, once
you have paid the money via paypal it is gone

- By comparison, the simpler expedient of getting the recipient's bank
details, and arranging a transfer is cheaper, and works well. (I've used
it to send money to Keith, and to get money from Paul G).=20
=20
True=20

- Where one person is arranging a group order, there are three possible
areas for resentment:

1: The person making the order has ordered extra items on behalf of
people who effectively change their minds once payment has been made by
the orderer... This means that the person organising the deal gets
pissed off and is left with items in hand.=20
=20
So money up front should be the norm=20

2: The person making the order is perceived to be making a profit on it
- in my experience, it's virtually impossible to break even on these
deals if you need cash up front - currency fluctuations if nothing else!

=20
This really gets my goat, at these sort of prices it is nearly
impossible to make a paper profit, and even if you do the amount of time
and hassle more than outweighs that. If a price is given and people
agree to it then that is it. Anyone who doesn't like that should do
their own ordering.

3: The person making the order puts in a lot of work, and then finds out
that some people have bought items at =A3x from him as part of the deal,
only to sell them immediately for a large markup.

This one is tricky as it concerns the right to free trade but the
solution of a 4 week period makes sense.


I would suggest, therefore, that the following is the best set of ground
rules...

1: The organiser tries to work out a "delivered, duty and VAT paid in
the UK" price, including delivery to the organiser's house/office.=20
=20
Makes sense=20

2: The organiser adds 10% to this price as a contingency and publishes
this price as the "if you want to send me money now, this is the price
you'll get charged" price.=20
=20
yup=20

3: For those wishing/able to collect direct from the organiser (either
individually or on behalf of a local-area group), that is the price that
needs to be paid IN ADVANCE.=20
=20
Definitely=20

4: For those wishing that the organiser should deliver, they arrange
individually a fair sum for this carriage, which is also paid in
advance. (Or perhaps, in arrears for the actuals, given the sums are
likely to be relatively small.)=20
=20
yup=20

5: The organiser uses the 10% contingency to over-order volumes by 5% to
cope with damaged-in-transit items, and keeps the other 5% as a
contingency against currency fluctuations / "adminsitration costs
imposed by couriers" etc.=20
=20
makes sense=20

6: At the end of the excercise, if there are spare units, the organiser
has 4 weeks to sell them AT ANY PRICE, during which all the other
participants commit to NOT selling their units on!=20
=20
4 weeks seems like a good balance=20

7: Finally, if the organiser is left with a surplus, then they have
three options, depending entirely on what they feel is appropriate:

- Keep it as a "thank you" from the group
- Put it behind the bar at the next UKHA get together as a drinks float
- Cut it up, and send small sums back to the participants!

Generally I think the organiser should keep any surplus as it would at
least partially compensate them for their hard work!
=20


=20

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>=20=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.=20