The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: DVD drive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Item on home automation from w2k news


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Item on home automation from w2k news
  • From: "James Hoye" <james.hoye@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:49:35 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> When I was confronted with how to wire the house, experience in the IT
> world taught me that the only constant is change. So in ten years this
> area is going to look completely different from now. New industry
> standards will have come and gone. So the best thing you can do is
wire
> as much as possible, and even overdo it a bit, for example just in
case
> things like video-on-demand finally make it and you need high
> definition, high bandwidth to most of the rooms in your house.

> wiring was done. Structured wiring has 2 coax, 2 cat5 and 2 fiber
> strands nicely tucked together in a jacket.
>
> That means for every room you can plug a personal computer into a
100Mb
> Ethernet LAN, you can intelligently distribute both video and audio,
and
> optical in a later stage. I decided to keep the cost down and not trim
> out the fiber yet, but the Cat5 and coax will be hot from the start.
>
> The good thing of double Cat5 is that you can use the second 8 strands
> in there for phone, audio or other devices instead of a LAN. I also
had

LOL - this guy talks about overdoing the structured cabling and constant
change, then goes on to talk about running TWO CAT5s to each room -
allowing
a networked PC and a phone as a bonus.

James H



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.