[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Location of Sky+ box in HA System
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Location of Sky+ box in HA System
- From: "andy_powell_is" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 22:04:14 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Me me me....
I'll do it Keith... and if you want any hope with the VB I'm happy to
help where I can.
Andy
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Keith Doxey" <ukha@d...> wrote:
> Ordered some more components today.
>
> Spent the last couple of days reading datasheets and application
notes.
>
> About to start playing with a PIC chip that users will be able to
update
> from their own PC having downloaded the latest firmware from my
site. I will
> be writing a small VB application to do the loading and then will
have a
> small project box with a few LED's on it that will be driven by a
couple of
> demo programs. I will then be looking for a couple of victims to
test the
> update procedure. It may involve an element of risk as I dont know
how good
> my first VB Loader application will be !!!!
>
> Keith
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gareth Cook [mailto:gcook@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 11 January 2002 18:18
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Subject: Fw: [ukha_d] Location of Sky+ box in HA System
>
>
>
> Any ETAs for the switcher, Keith ?
>
> And a distributor or mass producer (under license) for you ?
>
> G.
> Gareth Cook
> Senior Engineering Specialist
> EMEA ED, IBM SWG
> Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG Office: +44 (0) 1784 445 166
> Mobile: +44 (0) 7980 445 166
> Fax: +44 (0) 1784 499 166 Work: g@xxxxxxx
> Personal: g@xxxxxxx
> AIM Chat : TheBoyG
> MSN Chat : chat@g...
>
>
> ----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 11/01/2002 18:16 -----
> Discussion
> Main Topic
>
> "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@b...>
> Today 17:45
>
> . Subject:
> . RE: [ukha_d] Location of Sky+ box in HA System
> .
> Category:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Is there any reason not to put it in node zero as I will have
IR
> > distribution and Video via Kat5 (hopefully)?
> >
>
> [Kenneth Watt]
>
> If you will be using KAT5 why not hang on for the switcher then
it won't
> matter where you put it if you use KAT5 to route to all the
displays?
>
> K.
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@y...
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@y...
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|