The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FW: Shop@Kodak DX3700 Digital Camera


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: FW: Shop@Kodak DX3700 Digital Camera
  • From: "Don McAllister" <donmc@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:58:37 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Title: Message

Mine just rang back to say it wasn’t a contract as no money changed hands L but there may be redress in prosecution due to price misrepresentation.

 

We’ll see

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 January 2002 11:46
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ukha_d] FW: Shop@Kodak DX3700 Digital Camera

 

My local trading standards just phoned back form the email I sent.

 

The guy said as far as they were concerned I had "a legally binding contract" and the Kodak had "a lot of egg on their face".  He is forwarding my details to TS in Hertfordshire which is apparently collating all the info on this one.

 

We live in hope

 

M.

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:26 AM

Subject: RE: [ukha_d] FW: Shop@xxxxxxx DX3700 Digital Camera

 

Everyone,

 

Surely if there are enough people on this list who ordered a camera would it not be worthwhile the group of us getting together to formulate an email to Kodak representing our concerns and indicating that we would wish to instigate the necessary legal action.

 

An indication that a group of us would wish to take this further may concern them enough to fulfill the orders.

 

Just an idea

 

kieran

-----Original Message----- 
From: Steve Morgan [mailto:steve@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:23 AM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] FW: Shop@Kodak DX3700 Digital Camera

If Kodak were to fulfil every order without question, it would cost them a packet. The most likely course they'll take is to wait until people threaten legal action, and then fulfil the order rather than go to court. That way, they'll only have to send out cameras to those people who are prepared to fight for them - which is likely to be a quite small proportion because most people won't bother.

 

Small claims is cheap and, after all, it's a bit of fun!

 

I wonder if Kodak will be revamping their e-commerce system soon?

 

Wish I'd ordered one myself, now - I don't want one, but it would be fun to take it the distance.

 

Steve



For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.