The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Sharing Outlook contacts with a laptop


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for £100


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for £100
  • From: "musashi1977uk" <musashi1977uk@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:35:08 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Actually I thought the ruling on the Argos case was that individuals=20
who had ordered single TV's had their orders honoured as they=20
honestly believed that the price was a genuine bargain and thus the=20
contract was entered into without malace or deception, whereas the=20
people who ordered multiple TV's did NOT get their orders honoured as=20
the contract was entered into on the grounds of deception and thus=20
made the contracts void.
In this case the vendor has made an invitation to treat (the advert)=20
and by sending credit card details is an offer to purchase and=20
Kodak's issuing of a reciept is a contract of sale, therefore as long=20
as we believe that the sale price was genuine and not a=20
misrepresentation, I believe our original contract with the vendor=20
stands

Simon Rafferty

--- In ukha_d@y..., "White, Peter" <peter.white@b...>
wrote:
> IIRC Argos had something similar a year or so ago, that was widely
> publicised and covered by Watchdog.  I think it was for a colour=20
telly at
> =A319.99 instead of =A3199.99.  Needless to say, they did not
honour=20
any orders.
> this was however only on the site for a few hours, whereas Kodak=20
have left
> it up there all weekend.  Presumably their web team doesn't work=20
weekends
> (or monday's before 10!)
>=20
> Pete
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MIME:mark@a... at INTERNET
> To: White, Peter; ukha_d@y... at Internet
> Sent: 07/01/02 10:35
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for =A3100
>=20
> Grabbed a copy of the site just before it was changed...
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/images/temp/kodak.jpg
>=20
> I have the HTML too.
>=20
> Any "legal" people on this list?  My experience of these
things -=20
like
> with=20
> ISPs - leads me to think they have a "get-out" clause for
this sort=20
of
> thing.=20
>  Seem to remember "invitation to treat" as well - basically
I can=20
put=20
> something in my window for sale at 1p but I don;t have to sell it=20
to you
> at=20
> that.
>   Another one for the "UKHA Legal Team"?? ;-)
>=20
>  <<ALTERNATIVE.HTM>>  <<ENVELOPE.TXT>>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.