The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for £100


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for £100
  • From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:04:50 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Kenneth,

You are correct when you write: "you and the vendor have agreed the
terms and the contract of sale has been made"

The problem is that you have agreed the term which allows the vendor to
choose not to supply you the goods for any "special offer" items
if they
haven't already billed your CC.

Given that this was a "special offer" (see Mark M's post earlier)
then
legally, they probably would win. The question is how much bad will and
bad publicity they can take. Nothing like a hundred letters to Watchdog
to make them come round ;-)

Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher


-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Watt [mailto:kennwatt@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 7 January 2002 17:52
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for =A3100


This is the confusing bit for me, as if the confirmation mail is a
"receipt" as per the wording of it and also serves as the proof
of
warranty then, IMO, you and the vendor have agreed the terms and the
contract of sale has been made. That is my understanding of the law,
although I'm pretty sure I'll be proved wrong!

I would lay good odds that Kodak have been down at their barristers
office today :-)

Again, only IMO, if I arse it up like this in my business then too bad,
I have to suffer the loss admittedly though, I have never erred to this
degree.

K.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Crowther [mailto:scrowther@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 07 January 2002 11:33
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for =A3100
>=20
> so reading this its not a sale until money changes hands...?
>=20
> does that mean if they bill your c/c and it appears on my
> statement they have to sell it?
> (not that i ordered one...  :-(   )
>=20
> Scott Crowther
> Intamac Systems Ltd
>=20
> t: +44 (0)1604 679262
> e. scrowther@xxxxxxx
> w. www.intamac.com
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Mc Aree [mailto:michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 07 January 2002 11:25
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for =A3100
>=20
>=20
> OK - Found the Argos case.
>=20
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/6632.html
>=20
>=20
> Michael
>=20
>=20
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>=20
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>=20




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a pro-active anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe visit http://www.messagelabs.com/


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.